Literature | The Knowledge Dynasty

Literature

Children’s books with humans have greater moral impact than animals, study finds

Undercutting the ageless tradition of sugaring ethical lessons with endearing animals, new research suggests human protagonists are needed to change behaviour.

aesop character

 

Forget the morals that millennia of children have learned from the Hare and the Tortoise and the Fox and the Crow: Aesop would have had a greater effect with his fables if hed put the stories into the mouths of human characters, at least according to new research from the University of Torontos Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).

In the Canadian study, researchers read one of three stories to almost 100 children between four and six years old: Mary Packards Little Raccoon Learns to Share, in which anthropomorphic animals learn that sharing makes you feel good; a version of the story in which the animal illustrations were replaced with human characters; or a control book about seeds.

Before they were read the story, the children chose 10 stickers to take home and were told that an anonymous child would not have any stickers to take home. It was suggested to the children that they could share their stickers with the stickerless child by putting them in an envelope when the experimenter was not looking. After they had been read the story, the children were allowed to choose another 10 stickers, and again asked to donate to the stickerless child.

The study, which has just been published in the journal Developmental Science, found that those children who were read the book with human characters became more generous, while in contrast, there was no difference in generosity between children who read the book with anthropomorphised animal characters and the control book; both groups showed a decrease in sharing behaviour, they write.

The academics, led by Patricia Ganea, associate professor of early cognitive development at OISE, said that existing studies using the same method showed that before they are six, children share hardly any stickers with their friends, and even after age six, children keep most of the stickers for themselves, so the task offers a lot of room for children to change their sharing behaviour after reading the story.

But reading a book about sharing had an immediate effect on children’s pro-social behaviour, they found. However, the type of story characters significantly affected whether children became more or less inclined to behave pro-socially. After hearing the story containing real human characters, young children became more generous. In contrast, after hearing the same story but with anthropomorphised animals or a control story, children became more selfish.

Ganea said that while a growing body of research has shown that young children more readily apply what they’ve learned from stories that are realistic this is the first time we found something similar for social behaviours.

“The finding is surprising given that many stories for young children have human-like animals,” said Ganea.

From Aesop to the Gruffalo via Winnie-the-Pooh, talking animals play a major part in childrens literature. A 2002 review of around 1,000 childrens titles found that more than half of the books featured animals or their habitats, of which fewer than 2% depicted animals realistically, the majority anthropomorphising them.

Ganea felt that it would be useful for childrens authors to be aware of her research. “We tell stories to children for many reasons, and if the goal is to teach them a moral lesson then one way to make the lesson more accessible to children is to use human characters. Yes, we should consider the diversity of story characters and the roles they are depicted in,” she said.

Chris Haughton, author and illustrator of animal picture books including Oh No, George! and Shh! We Have a Plan, felt that while a simple instructional moral message might work short term, the stories that have longer impact are the ones that resonate deeply. “I read Charlotte’s Web as a child and I know that made a big impression on me. I thought about it for a long time after I read the story. I identified with the non-human characters. That, among other things, did actually turn me into a lifelong vegetarian. I think a truly engaging and quality story that resonates with the child will be replayed in their mind and that has the real effect on them and the course of their life,” he said.

Picture book author Tracey Corderoy said that in her experience, where the main characters of a moral tale are animals as opposed to humans, the slight distancing that this affords the young child does a number of important things. “It softens the moral message a little, making it slightly more palatable. Some would feel that this waters it down and makes it less effective. But the initial saving-face that using animals brings quite often results, I feel at least, in keeping a child reader engaged.”

Kes Gray, the author of the bestselling rhyming animal series Oi Frog and Friends, was unperturbed by the researchers findings. “Authors and illustrators have no need to panic here, as long as we keep all of the animal protagonists in all of their future stories unreservedly cuddly. Big hair, big eyes and pink twitchy noses should pretty much nail it,” he said.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/01/only-childrens-books-with-humans-have-moral-impact-study-finds

LeVar Burton sued for using ‘Reading Rainbow’ catchphrase on his podcast

Actor LeVar Burton, who taught Gen-Xers and millennials about the wonders of literature via PBS’ Reading Rainbow, is being sued for his continued use of the show’s iconic catchphrase. The 60-year-old peppered his podcast, LeVar Burton Reads, with the tagline “But you don’t have to take my word for it,” and that’s put him in legally dubious territory.

WNED-TV Buffalo, New York, which originally produced Reading Rainbow, is suing Burton. It’s the latest chapter in an ongoing dispute about the show’s intellectual property. As the Hollywood Reporter notes, the suit alleges that Mr. Burton’s goal is to control and reap the benefits of Reading Rainbow’s substantial goodwill that unquestionably belongs to WNED. More specifically, that Burton is guilty of: copyright infringement, conversion, cybersquatting, violations of the Lanham Act, breach of contract and interference with customer relations. WNED is seeking profits from the actor’s podcast.

Burton’s RRKidz production outlet has been working with a proper licensing agreement from WNED since 2011. Though he acquired the rights to the brand, turned Reading Rainbow into a successful iPad app in 2012, and raised millions on Kickstarter to revive the series in 2014, the original agreement is murky. As the Reporter notes:

WNED’s interpretation of the agreement is that the 2011 deal represented a divide and conquer approach to the renaissance of Reading Rainbow whereby RRKidz would be allowed to take over digital distribution of the series while the broadcaster would focus on making new episodes. Profits were to be split.

Burton hosted Reading Rainbow from 1983 to 2006, during which he won 12 Emmys. As of Aug. 1, readingrainbow.com is no longer operated by RRKidz. In its place: the original logo, attributed to WNED. It’s a bitter reminder that nothing gold can stay.

H/T the Hollywood Reporter

Read more: https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/levar-burton-reading-rainbow-lawsuit/

Before Amazon, We Had Bookmobiles: 15+ Rare Photos Of Libraries-On-Wheels

Long before Amazon, Audible, and other digital book distributors, bookmobiles were bringing literature to peoples’ doorsteps. Their mission was to provide the written word to remote villages and city suburbs that had no libraries. We invite you to remember these almost forgotten four-wheelers of the past.

The first bookmobile is believed to have appeared in Warrington, England in the late 1850s. It was a horse-drawn cart, and lent about 12,000 books during its first year of service. Later, mobile libraries were installed inside vehicles and reached the height of their popularity in the mid-20th century when they had become a part of Americal life.

Although bookmobiles are still operated in some parts of the world by libraries, schools, activists, and other organizations, they are widely thought to be an outdated service due to high costs, advanced technology and impracticality.

(h/t: vintageeveryday, messynessychic)

#22 The Library’s Bookmobile

#23 Children Gathering At The Bookmobile, C. 1912

#24 Children Gathering At The Kern County Free Library Bookmobile At Aztec School, 1947

Read more: http://www.boredpanda.com/bookmobile-library-on-wheels/

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Coursera

New Skills, New You: Transform your career in 2016 with Coursera

Follow us on Twitter